[ppml] 2005-1 or its logical successor

[Owen DeLong]

--On October 28, 2005 1:26:42 PM +0000 bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:

>> > - preexisting IPv4 deployment should qualify you for IPv6 assignment.
>> 
>> Yes. Why do people need IPv6 addresses? To deploy a network.
>> How do they prove that they will deploy a network? Show
>> that they have already done so using v4 addresses.
> 
> 	i would not want to see a restriction on v6 delegations	
> 	only to those w/ preexisting v4 delegations.

I don't think the intent was to restrict it, but, to allow people who
had already qualified for V4 delegations to use it as one method of
v6 justification.  If the policies are made consistent, then, the
fact that you already made it through the process for a V4 allocation
does provide substantial evidence that you should be entitled to
a V6 allocation.

Owen

-- 
If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20051028/39b15a00/attachment.sig>