[ppml] 2005-1 or its logical successor

[Bill Woodcock]

      On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
    > For those who couldn't make it  to L.A. (I am assuming  you did), could you provide some
    > context for this ?

A revised-by-committee manglement of 2005-1 was presented, which had a ton 
of restrictions piled on top of it, which made it useless.  That is, there 
was no remaining constituency for it.  A huge queue of speakers denounced 
it, and only one person spoke in its favor, Dan Golding, and he said the 
only reason he supported it was because he thought fixing it later would 
be faster than revising it again.  Fortunately, sanity prevailed, and the 
whole thing was sent back to the drawing board to have all the junk 
stripped back off.  

Which, I think, brings us back to the original 2005-1.

So my question was whether there's anyone who, having seen the much 
nastier alternative, doesn't now support the original 2005-1?

                                -Bill