[ppml] 2005-1 or its logical successor

[Bill Woodcock]

      On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, [iso-8859-1] Andrew Dul wrote:
    > I would expect all those who didn't support the policy on the grounds of routing/FIB table growth also to object to the original 2005-1 text.

And is that a non-zero set?

                                -Bill