[ppml] 2005-1 or its logical successor
Howard, W. Lee
Lee.Howard at stanleyassociates.com
Wed Nov 2 18:47:21 EST 2005
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
> Behalf Of Paul Vixie
> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 10:17 AM
> To: ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [ppml] 2005-1 or its logical successor
>
> # True, though if things get too out of hand the bunch at the
> UN has the
> # regulatory power to encourage conformance.
>
> um, no. actually, the UN does not have (and should not have,
> and will never
> have) that kind of regulatory power.
I agree with "does not" and "should not," but "will never have"
is not clear to me.
> if the IP community were
> to seek regionalized aggregatability in its block
> allocations, then "geo" is not what the end users would want.
Current policy is to allocate on geographic regional
boundaries. Each RIR allocates from separate IPv4 /8s and IPv6
/23s. The fact that network operators do not aggregate, or
that operators connect in multiple regions, is beyond the scope
of ARIN to remedy.
Lee
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list