why I ask ... Re: [ppml] tying back to 2005-1

[Lea Roberts]

On Fri, 20 May 2005, Edward Lewis wrote:

> >These were considered operational/implementation details that shouldn't
> >be spelled out in the policy itself...  again the assumption was that
> >whatever criteria an LIR should use would be applied.
>
> My reason for asking is to be better prepared to express opinions on
> the policy and to "vote" "the right way" the next time the policy is
> brought up.  (Leaving details to "assumptions" doesn't help draw
> wider interest in the policy development process.)
>
> I'm not asking that the questions and their answers be put into the
> policy text.

They are certainly reasonable questions and should be discussed here.

Now that the IPv6>>32 flames are turning to coals, we can always start
back on 2005-1...  I'm sure that will bring out some equally spirited and
strongly held views!	:-)   have a great week-end, all!!      /Lea