JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Mon May 9 14:40:25 EDT 2005
I mean core routers, not access routers, not CPEs.
> De: Paul Vixie <paul at vix.com>
> Responder a: <owner-ppml at arin.net>
> Fecha: Mon, 09 May 2005 18:16:53 +0000
> Para: <ppml at arin.net>
> Asunto: Re: [ppml] IPv6>>32
> jordi wrote, again in response to leo, as follows:
>> We have lots of examples of people don't following RFCs, and I don't
>> mean I agree with that, but is real life.
>> Keeping 128 bits in the lookup tables of core routers has been seen by
>> some chip set vendors as not useful, very expensive and time
>> consuming, while they only handle actually 64 bits routes in that part
>> of the network.
> no doubt.
>> Those routers don't expect to see the 64 bits of the host field to be
>> required for the routing, because they look into the aggregated route
>> towards the PoP, access network, or whatever is next.
> what routers? you lost me on that last part. which router/routers, exactly?
Barcelona 2005 Global IPv6 Summit
Registration open. Information available at:
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
More information about the ARIN-PPML