[ppml] /48 vs /32 micro allocations
andrew.dul at quark.net
Tue Mar 15 11:02:13 EST 2005
> From: "Owen DeLong" <owen at delong.com>
> Subject: Re: [ppml] /48 vs /32 micro allocations
> Sent: 14 Mar 2005 23:52:05
> I can think of at least one...
> The greater the sparsity of address utilization, the easier
> it is to hijack portions of the address space. That, in and of itself,
> to me seems like a good reason NOT to pursue a sparse allocation policy.
True, however... I'm hoping that the IETF rpsec working group is able to come up with a solution to authenticate & authorize BGP announcements. Having those in place would make hijacking more difficult.
More information about the ARIN-PPML