[ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv6 Direct assignments to end sites

[Ray Plzak]

I must point out that none of the RIRs guarantee routability.

Ray

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of
> Kurt Erik Lindqvist
> Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 6:46 AM
> To: Member Services
> Cc: ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv6 Direct assignments to end sites
> 
> 
> On 29 aug 2005, at 16.17, Member Services wrote:
> 
> [Proposal deleted]
> 
> You might want to note that there is no guarantee that this
> assignment will actually get routed. Just as in some RIR regions you
> will get less than a /24 v4 space as PI space, and you won't get very
> far...
> 
> >         6.5.8.1. To qualify for a direct end site assignment, an
> >                   organization must:
> >
> >                   a) not be an LIR;
> >
> >                   b) be an end site;
> >
> >                   c) be currently multi-homed using IPv6 to two or
> > more
> >                      separate LIR's. native connections or statically
> >                      configured tunnels may be used to satisfy this
> >                      requirement.
> 
> 
> What's a "statically configured tunnel" ? Does MPLS count? I would
> not call that a statically configured tunnel. So most L2VPN services
> are out of the question...
> 
> - kurtis -
> _______________________________________________
> PPML mailing list
> PPML at arin.net
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml