[ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv4 Micro-allocations for anycast services
owen at delong.com
Fri Aug 12 14:48:02 EDT 2005
Perhaps requiring the requestor to prove that they qualify for an
under ARIN policies rather than requiring them to actually possess one
a reasonable alternative. If you are actually multihomed with an ISP
block and have a legitimate need for multicast, I can't imagine that you
meet the criteria for an ARIN issued /22 whether you need it or not.
--On August 12, 2005 9:23:36 AM -0700 David Ulevitch <davidu at everydns.net>
> On Aug 12, 2005, at 8:47 AM, Alec H. Peterson wrote:
> Hi Alec,
>> For example, the issue has less to do with an entity not being able
>> to justify enough space for their entire enterprise and more to do
>> with the fact that they cannot carve a /24 out of their space for
>> fear of having it filtered. What if an org was required to already
>> have an ARIN allocation under the normal criteria to qualify for an
>> anycast block?
> I'm not sure that's the right idea. For example, I can multihome
> just fine with my ISP assigned block but I can't deploy an inter-as
> anycast system with it. Why should I abuse the micro-allocation or /
> 22 end-user multihoming policy just to meet an anycast /24 policy?
> Or perhaps I misunderstood you.
> David Ulevitch
> PPML mailing list
> PPML at arin.net
If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the ARIN-PPML