[ppml] 2005-1:Business Need for PI Assignments
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Wed Apr 27 09:26:04 EDT 2005
Michael and all,
I see that you violated your own policy regarding mentioning names
again. I also see that after a number of years you still have trouble
following threads on Emails. And finally, I see your attitude against
me or others you don't prefer is still very prevalent. As such, as a
matter of good policy discussion and determination, leadership is
not an area of endeavor advisable for those that harbor such
prevalent and distinct attitudes.
All this aside however, it is relevant that issues are directly
and indirectly connected with individuals whom are providing
some ideas as to how to determine policy's by which to address
Michael.Dillon at radianz.com wrote:
> > --On Tuesday, April 26, 2005 10:03 AM +0100 Michael.Dillon at radianz.com
> > wrote:
> One of the reasons why I get rid of lines like this when I
> reply to an email is because it is hard to keep track of exactly
> who said what beyond the message to which you are replying.
> > >> What I mean is - I have yet to be convinced that there is a concrete
> > >> reason to assign gobs of addresses to my house. Why not dole out
> > >> IPv6 a few addresses at a time until it's clear I need a /48 or /52
> > >> or /60.
> For example, I didn't say this, Ed Lewis did.
> > > Not at all. Innovation comes about when traditional ways of doing
> > > things can no longer cope. It has nothing to do with IPv6 address
> > > conservation. If we run out of IPv6 addresses in the year 2105, then
> > > that may spark some innovation.
> > >
> > So you're saying we should waste addresses today in order to limit the
> > useful live of IPv6 because that will accelerate our development of the
> > next protocol. Michael, you have a unique way of viewing the world.
> And one of the reasons that I avoid mentioning names in replies is
> because it requires extra work to make sure that I really am replying
> to the train of thought of the named individual. It also leads to
> personal clashes which are not terribly fruitful. Here, you actually
> are quoting something that I wrote on fragmentation, but you are
> me as well because this reference to my name again implies that I wrote
> Ed Lewis's words above.
> It is better to restrict the conversation to ideas and not the
> behind them. If you don't like the personalities, then don't reply to
> messages at all. For instance, as a matter of policy, I never reply to
> anything written by Jeff Williams.
> --Michael Dillon
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827
More information about the ARIN-PPML