[ppml] 2005-1 alternatives
dr at cluenet.de
Tue Apr 19 19:17:28 EDT 2005
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 05:36:03PM -0400, Steve Feldman wrote:
> >>Maybe possession of PI v4 space?
> >Why that? What sense would that make?
> It's just a strawman, but I was trying to think of some objective
> criterion that said the applicant is a legitimate multihomer, not
> just an address space squatter. Better ideas are encouraged!
I'm not sure about ARIN policy here, but in RIPE, only multihomers do
get an ASN nowadays.
> The main objection to using possession of an AS as the criterion
> was that it would cause a run on the RIRs for new AS assignments.
Depends on what the policy for getting an ASN is. If it needs
multihoming, then... well...
I don't think people will start multihoming just to get IPv6 PI space in
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
More information about the ARIN-PPML