[ppml] Policy Proposal 2004-3 point of order
bicknell at ufp.org
Tue Apr 19 11:15:34 EDT 2005
In a message written on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 03:25:50PM +0100, Michael.Dillon at radianz.com wrote:
> Here is the chronology that you claim:
> RFC 2050 - yes
> Old Wording - no
> New Wording - yes
This is incorrect. ARIN has said "yes" under the old wording. The more
accurate description is:
RFC 2050 = yes, and everyone understood that it was a yes.
Old Wording = yes, but some people were confused, and thought it was a
no, like you.
New Wording = yes, and everyone will understand it is a yes.
Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request at tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the ARIN-PPML