[ppml] 2005-1 and/or Multi6
kloch at hotnic.net
Thu Apr 14 14:32:07 EDT 2005
Owen DeLong wrote:
> An AS holder that needs a /32 instead of a /48 should have no
> problem meeting the current guidelines for getting a /32.
> To claim that this is not wasteful simply because it is the
> same percentage of total space is absurd. Waste is measured
> in terms of efficient resource utilization. Using 1 address
> for a host (an IPv4 /32) is about as non-wasteful as you
> can get. OTOH, using 2^96 addresses for one host, or, even
> for 1,000,000 hosts is quite a bit more wasteful. I'm not
> saying that waste in this case is necessarily harmful, but,
> I do think it should still be avoided unless there is
> compelling reason to commit such waste.
The real waste is the wase of bandwidth and memory for carrying
bits 64-127. Since we're stuck with that...
For prefixes /32 and longer, allocations should be filter friendly and
promote aggregation first, and relatively efficient second.
I am concerned about prefixes much shorter than /32, and think
the HD ratio should be re-evaluated as suggested in this draft:
More information about the ARIN-PPML