[ppml] 2005-1 and/or Multi6
Howard, W. Lee
L.Howard at stanleyassociates.com
Wed Apr 13 13:33:44 EDT 2005
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ppml at arin.net [mailto:owner-ppml at arin.net] On
> Behalf Of Andrew Dul
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 12:38 PM
> To: ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [ppml] 2005-1 and/or Multi6
> > since one of the good arguments for 2005-1 is to allow provider
> > independent multi-homing, is there anyone out there who has been
> > following the multi6 working group in IETF who believes
> there will a
> > timely alternative forthcoming from that working group?
> I was at the last IETF meeting in Minneapolis and attended
> the multi6 working group meeting & shim6 BOF.
Outstanding! I wish there was more cross-over, myself included.
> I assume that those who received the address space would not
> willingly return it.
A reasonable assumption, IMHO.
> Interestingly I had an exchange at the microphone during the
> IAB Plenary open session about this topic. I pointed that
> this policy existing and is being considered in the ARIN
> region and if this policy was implemented the ideas about a
> very small v6 routing table may go away. Someone responded
> with a comment like, that is just fine for the first 65k routes.
Any suggestion on the four billion routes after that?
What Moore's Law needs is penalties for non-compliance.
More information about the ARIN-PPML