[ppml] Policy Proposal 2004-3 point of order

[Leo Bicknell]

In a message written on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 03:25:50PM +0100, Michael.Dillon at radianz.com wrote:
> Here is the chronology that you claim:
> 
> RFC 2050 - yes
> Old Wording - no
> New Wording - yes

This is incorrect.  ARIN has said "yes" under the old wording.  The more
accurate description is:

RFC 2050    = yes, and everyone understood that it was a yes.
Old Wording = yes, but some people were confused, and thought it was a
              no, like you.
New Wording = yes, and everyone will understand it is a yes.

-- 
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request at tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20050419/32407ee3/attachment.sig>