[ppml] Policy Proposal 2005-3: Lame Delegations

[Glenn Wiltse]

  Why?  Why is this nessasary? If someone's got their
in-addr.arpa stuff broken, it's not really hurting anyone but
themselves. Seems like this is a waste of ARIN resources to me.

Glenn

On Fri, 18 Mar 2005, Member Services wrote:

> ARIN welcomes feedback and discussion about this policy proposal in the
> weeks leading to the ARIN Public Policy Meeting in Orlando, Florida,
> scheduled for April 18-20, 2005.
>
> The policy proposal text is below and can be found at
> http://www.arin.net/policy/2005_3.html.
>
> Note that the author revised the text so that it is not specific to a
> single protocol.
>
> According to the ARIN Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process the
> ARIN Advisory Council will evaluate policy proposals after the Public
> Policy Meeting. The feedback and discussion of policy proposals on the
> Public Policy Mailing List will be included in the AC's evaluation.
>
> Subscription information for the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List can be
> found at http://www.arin.net/mailing_lists/index.html.
>
> The ARIN Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process can be found at
> http://www.arin.net/policy/ipep.html.
>
> ARIN's Policy Proposal Archive can be found at
> http://www.arin.net/policy/proposal_archive.html.
>
> Regards,
>
> Member Services
> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
>
>
> ### * ###
>
>
> Policy Proposal 2005-3: Lame Delegations
>
> Author name: Paul Andersen on behalf of the ARIN AC
>
> Policy term: permanent
>
> Policy statement: This policy proposal replaces section 7.2 of the ARIN
> NRPM.
>
> ARIN will actively identify lame DNS name server(s) for reverse address
> delegations associated with address blocks allocated, assigned or
> administered by ARIN. Upon identification of a lame delegation, ARIN
> shall attempt to contact the POC for that resource and resolve the
> issue. If, following due diligence, ARIN is unable to resolve the lame
> delegation, ARIN will update the WHOIS database records resulting in the
> removal of lame servers.
>
> Rationale: The policy as stated could not be implemented without placing
> an undue burden on ARIN staff resources. The procedures mandated in the
> policy require a shifting of registration service resources from such
> activities as IP Analyst support for on-going registration actions as
> well as the telephonic and email help desks. Removing the procedures
> from the policy allows the Director of Registration Services the
> flexibility of meeting all registration services needs and managing the
> identification, notification, and removal of lame delegations.
>
> Timetable for implementation: 90 days after adoption
>
>
>
>
>
>
> !DSPAM:423af94625628103238693!
>
>
>