[ppml] Policy Proposal 2004-7: Residential Customer Privacy P olicy
owen at delong.com
Tue Oct 19 20:20:06 EDT 2004
In other words, is it a natural person, or, a legal entity with no
existence outside of it's legal construction (such as a corporation).
However, for a schedule C business, and many other forms of
and partnerships, this test would not accurately match the intent of the
--On Tuesday, October 19, 2004 22:44 +0000 bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
> hum... juristic .... sounds like a term of art that is
> alien to most venues i frequent. consistancy of legal
> interpretation across jurisdictions is not a common
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 11:15:20PM +0200, Gregory Massel wrote:
>> Quite simple - Is the entity that contracted for the service a natural
>> person or a juristic person?
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Paul Bradford" <paul.bradford at adelphiacom.net>
>> To: <ppml at arin.net>
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 10:53 PM
>> Subject: RE: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2004-7: Residential Customer Privacy
>> P olicy
>> > So what is the criteria for a "non business" service? How do you
>> > get ISPs to enforce this? If I spam from my home... am I using it for
>> > a business? nope... it's my residential static IP Block....
>> > Just a few random thoughts that went through my head...
>> > Thanks,
>> > Paul
If this message was not signed with gpg key 0FE2AA3D, it's probably
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the ARIN-PPML