[ppml] Policy Proposal 2004-7: Residential Customer Privacy P olicy

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Tue Oct 19 20:20:06 EDT 2004


In other words, is it a natural person, or, a legal entity with no
existence outside of it's legal construction (such as a corporation).

However, for a schedule C business, and many other forms of 
sole-proprieterships
and partnerships, this test would not accurately match the intent of the
policy.

Owen


--On Tuesday, October 19, 2004 22:44 +0000 bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com 
wrote:

>
> 	hum... juristic .... sounds like a term of art that is
> 	alien to most venues i frequent.  consistancy of legal
> 	interpretation across jurisdictions is not a common
> 	trait.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 11:15:20PM +0200, Gregory Massel wrote:
>> Quite simple - Is the entity that contracted for the service a natural
>> person or a juristic person?
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Paul Bradford" <paul.bradford at adelphiacom.net>
>> To: <ppml at arin.net>
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 10:53 PM
>> Subject: RE: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2004-7: Residential Customer Privacy
>> P olicy
>>
>>
>> >     So what is the criteria for a "non business" service?  How do you
>> > get ISPs to enforce this?  If I spam from my home... am I using it for
>> > a business?  nope... it's my residential static IP Block....
>> > Just a few random thoughts that went through my head...
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Paul
>> >
>>



-- 
If this message was not signed with gpg key 0FE2AA3D, it's probably
a forgery.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20041019/e86fb0d3/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list