[ppml] Draft ARIN Recomendation

[Owen DeLong]

I think the key point here is not the "membership" approval needed, but, 
that
ARIN happens to represent a constituency that is not limited to its members.
I think that ARIN should state something to the effect that:

ARIN, on behalf of its members and constituents, many of whom have expressed
concern on this issue, requests that the IETF...

Owen

--On Thursday, October 21, 2004 17:12 -0400 Leo Bicknell <bicknell at ufp.org> 
wrote:

> In a message written on Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 02:14:13PM -0700,
> william(at)elan.net wrote:
>> I would like to check also if Leo really wanted this to be "The ARIN
>> Membership" as that implies that only ARIN Members should be commenting
>> on  this topic which makes a topic for ARIN members mailing list rather
>> then  ppml but it seems to me the actual topic and recommendation is more
>> of  public policy type and we should not therefore use words "ARIN
>> Membership" however I do not have concreterecommendationn on what to
>> replace this with.
>
> My assumption is that will go through a new process which will allow the
> ARIN Membership to put their stamp of approval on this statement.  Since
> that's not defined, I have posted the initial version here for lack of
> anywhere else.



-- 
If this message was not signed with gpg key 0FE2AA3D, it's probably
a forgery.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20041021/b236d990/attachment.sig>