[ppml] Fw: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!)

Charles Scott cscott at gaslightmedia.com
Tue Jun 29 09:24:24 EDT 2004

  Question? Is this a ruling affecting the provider only, or was ARIN a
party in this legal action? In otherwords, is this only binding on the 
provider or is it also binding on ARIN. It would seem that if ARIN was not 
a party in the case, that ARIN may not be bound by the decision. If so, 
would ARIN still be able to enforce the non-portability of address space, 
potentially leaving the party who won portability with an empty victory?
  Can someone provide a link to the full text of the decision?


On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Ray Plzak wrote:

> The ARIN General Counsel is and has been aware of this.  Appropriate
> measures are being considered and will be pursued.  The actions taken by
> ARIN in this regard will be a matter of the appropriate public record.
> Raymond A. Plzak
> President & CEO
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ppml at arin.net [mailto:owner-ppml at arin.net] On Behalf Of
> > Michael.Dillon at radianz.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 6:03 AM
> > To: ppml at arin.net
> > Subject: Re: [ppml] Fw: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court
> > says yes!)
> > 
> > > Is ARIN's legal counsel aware of this? Will the ARIN trustees be
> > > considering whether
> > > or not to file a "friend of the court" brief with the New York state
> > > court?
> > 
> > Oops. That should be Superior Court of State New Jersey.

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list