[ppml] Fw: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!)

[Ray Plzak]

I have assigned the ARIN General Counsel, who is an experienced litigator,
the task to review and prepare the necessary filings to either intervene
formally in the New Jersey case, or as an amicus.  ARIN will be striving to
educate the court to understand more accurately the legal and policy issues
involved.

Raymond A. Plzak
President & CEO

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ppml at arin.net [mailto:owner-ppml at arin.net] On Behalf Of
> Charles Scott
> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 9:24 AM
> To: Ray Plzak
> Cc: Michael.Dillon at radianz.com; ppml at arin.net
> Subject: RE: [ppml] Fw: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court
> says yes!)
> 
> 
> Ray:
>   Question? Is this a ruling affecting the provider only, or was ARIN a
> party in this legal action? In otherwords, is this only binding on the
> provider or is it also binding on ARIN. It would seem that if ARIN was not
> a party in the case, that ARIN may not be bound by the decision. If so,
> would ARIN still be able to enforce the non-portability of address space,
> potentially leaving the party who won portability with an empty victory?
>   Can someone provide a link to the full text of the decision?
> 
> Chuck
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Ray Plzak wrote:
> 
> > The ARIN General Counsel is and has been aware of this.  Appropriate
> > measures are being considered and will be pursued.  The actions taken by
> > ARIN in this regard will be a matter of the appropriate public record.
> >
> > Raymond A. Plzak
> > President & CEO
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-ppml at arin.net [mailto:owner-ppml at arin.net] On Behalf Of
> > > Michael.Dillon at radianz.com
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 6:03 AM
> > > To: ppml at arin.net
> > > Subject: Re: [ppml] Fw: Can a Customer take their IP's with them?
> (Court
> > > says yes!)
> > >
> > > > Is ARIN's legal counsel aware of this? Will the ARIN trustees be
> > > > considering whether
> > > > or not to file a "friend of the court" brief with the New York state
> > > > court?
> > >
> > > Oops. That should be Superior Court of State New Jersey.
> >
> >