[ppml] Provider Independence???

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Sun Dec 12 13:56:00 EST 2004


It is already generally noted in both ARIN policies and in the contract
signed by each and every person receiving resource allocations from ARIN 
that
the resource assignment can be revoked.  Under what circumstances and
in what time frame would be something I would rather leave to the people
crafting the policy to address the circumstances that lead to consensus
among the ARIN community that it was necessary.  Absent such consensus, I
do not believe that they should be withdrawn.

Owen


--On Friday, December 10, 2004 3:44 PM +0100 Kurt Erik Lindqvist 
<kurtis at kurtis.pp.se> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On 2004-12-08, at 23.51, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
>
>> In that light, it appears necessary to provide PI prefixes in the
>> immediate future, and we should be debating the current proposal in
>> comparison to the proposed alternatives (none) and to doing nothing.
>> If/when a viable alternative is developed, ARIN can modify or repeal
>> the PI policy based on community discussion.  Unlike v4 swamp
>> assignments, ARIN also has clear authority to reclaim _all_ v6
>> assignments if necessary.
>>
>> Today, there are about 16k origin-only ASes; that is the number of new
>> IPv6 routes that one would expect this policy to generate and is
>> clearly within the capabilities of today's hardware.  If demand is
>> significantly stronger than expected, the community can revisit
>> whether it is necessary to modify or repeal the policy to address
>> operational concerns even if no viable alternative has presented
>> itself yet.
>
> _*IF*_ this proposal was to be adopted (and I think there are
> alternatives), I would suggest you explicitly note that
>
> a) That any assignment made under it can be recalled
> b) With what notice the assignment can be recalled
> c) Under what conditions this assignment will be recalled
>
> - - kurtis -
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 8.1
>
> iQA/AwUBQbm2NaarNKXTPFCVEQI+ZACePAuaR4TivtA2kUbVBvSxyMcYOocAn2E5
> k83mUixKTlfHIO3Qqio65BP6
> =UgO+
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>



-- 
If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20041212/1af1386a/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list