[ppml] Geographic v6 addresses
jeroen at unfix.org
Wed Dec 8 10:47:16 EST 2004
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 15:33 +0000, Michael.Dillon at radianz.com wrote:
> For those interested in the issue of geographic addressing in IPv6
> you should probably read this current draft by Tony Hain
> Instead, I favour a scenario in which the geographic
> addresses are tied to exchange point locations, not endpoint
The big question: Who is going to pay for who's traffic.
> That way, if the Russian embassy in Washington DC
> feels the need to use Moscow IP addresses, they can tunnel
> back home and do so.
I seem to fail to see where the (IP level) 'multihoming' argument comes
> There may even be a perfectly valid
> reason for doing this to enable diplomats and their laptops
> to easily travel back and forth.
Never heard of the various mobility protocols I assume?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 240 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the ARIN-PPML