[ppml] Proposed Policy: PI assignments for V6

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Mon Dec 6 13:04:51 EST 2004

--On Monday, December 6, 2004 9:41 AM -0500 "Howard, W. Lee" 
<L.Howard at stanleyassociates.com> wrote:

> It was the consensus of the public when creating IPv6
> policy to enforce provider-based aggregation.  As I recall,
> this was the proposal that came from the IETF, and was
> ratified by all of the RIRs through their policy processes.
When that consensus was achieved, there were rapid/easy renumbering features
and other capabilities being proposed in IPv6 which have since been removed.
Those features were what made non-PI space acceptable to multihomed 
Since they have been removed, current IPv6 implementations do not make
PA space as palatable to a large portion of organizations, and, as such,
the needs of the community have changed.  This is an attempt to change
ARIN policy in recognition of those changing needs.


If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20041206/a745c24d/attachment-0001.sig>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list