[ppml] Reclamation (Was: Proposed Policy: PI assignments for V6)
Howard, W. Lee
L.Howard at stanleyassociates.com
Mon Dec 13 16:46:46 EST 2004
Please cite your sources.
Since 0.1 years is less than a year, you must be suggesting that reclamation
would save less than ten years, which would not be consistent with the
references you almost give.
Lee
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy at psg.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 2:25 PM
> To: Howard, W. Lee
> Cc: ppml at arin.net
> Subject: RE: [ppml] Reclamation (Was: Proposed Policy: PI
> assignments for V6)
>
>
> > It could be an interesting legal battle. I haven't seen
> contracts for
> > assignments made before ARIN, so I can't say whether they
> were made in
> > perpetuity. But I don't believe ARIN is required to
> provide IN-ADDR
> > delegations or WHOIS services for organizations with which
> is has no
> > relationship.
>
> actually, that committment was made to the fnc, nsf, and
> others in order to get permission to form arin.
>
> > If ARIN reclaimed all unused address space, (since I'm sure nobody
> > proposed reclaiming address space that's being used) how
> much would we
> > prolong the life of IPv4? I suspect it would be less than a year.
>
> i suggest you're off by a decimal order of magnitude. if the
> book is too difficult, see george's and geoff's movie.
>
> randy
>
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list