[ppml] Policy Proposal 2003-15: IPv4 Allocation Policy for the Africa Portion of the ARIN Region
raul at lacnic.net
Tue Sep 30 21:28:44 EDT 2003
At 01:02 a.m. 01/10/2003 +0200, William Stucke wrote:
>RIR MIN SIZE ELIGIBILITY
>APNIC /20 /22
>RIPE /20 /22
>LACNIC /20 /22
>ARIN /20 /20
It is not necessary right.
This comparison is very incomplete. For example, you are comparing the
ARIN''s requirements for ISPs single homed (/20 from upstream) with the
LACNIC's requirements for ISPs multihomed (/22)
If you take the same situation for both RIRs, you will have ARIN /20 and
LACNIC /21 for single homed and ARIN /21, LACNIC /22 for multihomed.
There are other differences in the policies. For example, under ARIN's
policies you don't have to renumber your network and under APNIC's policies
and LACNIC's policies you have to do it.
All the information is in the document that you already referred
More information about the ARIN-PPML