[ppml] Clarification of 2002-3 and final opinion of 2003-15

Leo Bicknell bicknell at ufp.org
Wed Sep 24 15:18:20 EDT 2003


In a message written on Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:14:51PM -0500, Mury wrote:
> Does this mean that a particular block will be used exclusively for
> micro-assignments?  Only micro-assignments will be made out of this block
> and all micro-assignments will be made from this block?

Yes.

> In other words anyone could aggregate this block in their routing tables
> if they wanted to?  I'm thinking especially of Tier II-III providers.

No!  It would be no more aggregatable than 64/8, or any other block
we're assigning IP's from.  The reason to put it into one block is
to make it possible for people to filter based on minimum allocation
size easily.

-- 
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request at tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20030924/88f69cba/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list