[ppml] Clarification of 2002-3 and final opinion of 2003-15

Leo Bicknell bicknell at ufp.org
Wed Sep 24 15:18:20 EDT 2003

In a message written on Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:14:51PM -0500, Mury wrote:
> Does this mean that a particular block will be used exclusively for
> micro-assignments?  Only micro-assignments will be made out of this block
> and all micro-assignments will be made from this block?


> In other words anyone could aggregate this block in their routing tables
> if they wanted to?  I'm thinking especially of Tier II-III providers.

No!  It would be no more aggregatable than 64/8, or any other block
we're assigning IP's from.  The reason to put it into one block is
to make it possible for people to filter based on minimum allocation
size easily.

       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request at tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20030924/88f69cba/attachment-0001.sig>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list