[ppml] New ARIN Sub-region Policy Proposal (Rural-America)
john at chagres.net
Wed Oct 8 12:44:47 EDT 2003
you are missing the point.
the rant about how to process a policy is moot and
not the issue. stop distracting away from the
core issue here and start working on the real issue(s).
i think am quite aware of how ARIN works, and doesn't
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 05:19:04PM +0100, Michael.Dillon at radianz.com wrote:
> >If this is not the time or day for the argument to provide portable space
> >for low population areas based upon the availability of connection
> >resources, I fail to see how this can become the time or day to reduce
> >allocation requirement based upon availability of connection resources.
> Let me explain the timing. Policies proposals cannot
> be voted on at an ARIN member meeting unless they
> have been submitted to ARIN 6 weeks prior to the meeting.
> The rural proposal missed that deadline, therefore
> this is not really the time to discuss the details
> of the proposal. In fact, I don't believe it was
> even submitted to ARIN formally so it will not even
> get handled at the following member meeting unless
> that is rectified.
> Before submitting a proposal about rural
> connectivity needs, we really do need some
> more discussion of the issue to deal with the
> potential objections that will arise if a policy
> is formally proposed. The policy BOF at the next
> meeting might be a good place to begin this. After
> the meeting is over, this list might be a good
> place to continue the discussion. The end result
> could be that there is a well-crafted policy
> proposal up for voting at the first ARIN meeting
> next year.
> But right now, it is better if the list focuses
> on the proposals listed here
> because that's what we will be voting on in
> two weeks or so.
> --Michael Dillon
More information about the ARIN-PPML