[ppml]How far is too far?

Dawn Martin dawn.martin at mci.com
Fri Oct 3 10:10:00 EDT 2003

Just wondering how far we intend on taking this? All assignments and
all allocations coming directly from the RIR's? 
-Dawn Martin

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ppml at arin.net [mailto:owner-ppml at arin.net]On Behalf Of Ron
da Silva
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 9:30 AM
To: ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [ppml] My idea was a non-starter

On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 02:04:38PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I am hoping that we can achieve clear consensus at the meeting, although,
> I think that will be difficult.

Better would be to determine that consensus here on the list and then
simply confirm it at the meeting.  To summarize,  I believe we have
thusfar seen some support AND opposition to 2002-3 and 2003-15 as-is.
There appears to be some interest in changing either to include
all of ARIN and both assignments and allocations.  I have yet to
see any principal objection to moving assignments/allocations to /22
under any permutation of 200x-315.  So, anyone care to argue AGAINST
changing either assignments or allocations under ANY policy variation?
Or, do we all support (or don't care to comment) such a change under
one of these new or modified policies?

fyi...not that this is an issue, but folks may be interested, other RIRs
have micro assignments but not micro allocations:



More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list