[ppml] Afrinic and so-called sub-regional policies
John Brown
john at chagres.net
Mon Oct 6 22:48:42 EDT 2003
Hi,
Being that I was *born and raised* in what we called Latin America,
ergo a country call Panama, I'd say that LACNIC is properly
defined.
Inso far as the long winded rants about policy, borders
and the like...
Policies created within ARIN *should* apply to the entire ARIN
region. Sub-region seems like a bad direction....
Cheers
john brown
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 08:22:45PM -0600, Trevor Paquette wrote:
> Point of reference...
>
> The following countries are part of LACNIC, and the last time I checked a map they are part of North America (and hence should be part of ARIN, not LACNIC)
>
> PANAMA
> COSTA RICA
> CUBA
> DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
> HONDURAS
> MEXICO
> NICARAGUA
> GUATEMALA
> ARUBA
> TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
>
> The argument regarding continental scope does not apply.
>
> It's very easy to shift boundaries to meet one's goals... as in the case of LACNIC, which is based more on a common language and culture, then on something that is continental in scope. Saying it is continental is just a 'convenience'.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ray Plzak [mailto:plzak at arin.net]
> > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 7:10 PM
> > To: 'Trevor Paquette'; 'Bill Woodcock'
> > Cc: Michael.Dillon at radianz.com; ppml at arin.net
> > Subject: RE: [ppml] Afrinic and so-called sub-regional policies
> >
> >
> > As a point of reference: An RIR must represent a region that is
> > continental in scope.
> >
> > Ray
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-ppml at arin.net [mailto:owner-ppml at arin.net] On
> > > Behalf Of Trevor Paquette
> > > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 7:45 PM
> > > To: 'Bill Woodcock'
> > > Cc: Michael.Dillon at radianz.com; ppml at arin.net
> > > Subject: RE: [ppml] Afrinic and so-called sub-regional policies
> > >
> > >
> > > Appreciate the humor and the shot at me, but I did not
> > > necessarily mean the US or Canada.. I meant parts there of..
> > >
> > > Who's to say that some new 'country' won't want to be
> > > considered to have their own RIR?
> > >
> > > 'Self-Government' as someone else put it...
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Bill Woodcock [mailto:woody at pch.net]
> > > > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 4:51 PM
> > > > To: Trevor Paquette
> > > > Cc: Michael.Dillon at radianz.com; ppml at arin.net
> > > > Subject: RE: [ppml] Afrinic and so-called sub-regional policies
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Trevor Paquette wrote:
> > > > > Don't assume this whole Africa thing will never
> > happen again..
> > > > > You'd best err on the side of 'when' it happens again..
> > > > and 'when'
> > > > > it does, look for that new country to want their own
> > > > policies etc..
> > > > > For the record, as a member of ARIN in good standing, I
> > > > cannot vote
> > > > > in favor of 2003-15.
> > > >
> > > > For the record, do you think that Canada will secede from
> > > > North America,
> > > > or the U.S. will?
> > > >
> > > > -Bill
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list