[ppml] Policy Proposal -- Limit Scope of Anonymous Allocations

[Leo Bicknell]

In a message written on Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 11:01:44AM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
> My argument is that that picture is a better start than no gate or hedges
> which is what 2003-3 is.

I'll buy that, but if and only if you plan to put up a fence.  But
that goes back to my original question.  With your proposal we have
the gate.  A fine start.  Please propose the fence (all the DHCP
based residential ISP's for which there is no info in whois) to go
along with it (separate policy is fine).

Without the fence the gate is something to find amusing and
inconvenient.


-- 
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request at tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20031119/cde020a7/attachment.sig>