[ppml] Last Call for Comment: Policy Proposal 2003-3

[Taylor, Stacy]

You are forgetting the vigilance of ARIN staff in the below scenario.  They
would *never* take a simple "Residential Customer" record as justification
for adequate utilization.
/S

-----Original Message-----
From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen at delong.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 11:04 AM
To: Ron da Silva; ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [ppml] Last Call for Comment: Policy Proposal 2003-3


OK... I can see this for a /28, but what about a /24, /22, /21, or even
a /13?  There's NOTHING in the residential customer privacy policy to
prevent ANY of those size allocations from being anonymous, and, nothing
that prevents the ISP from "making up" residential customers to chew
up space to justify more allocations.

Hiding the data this way prevents ARIN from being able to do it's job
and creates an invitation to abuse-friendly providers to do a land-grab
of vast amounts of abuse-friendly space scattered far and wide throughout
the IP space.

Owen


--On Wednesday, November 19, 2003 8:15 AM -0500 Ron da Silva <ron at aol.net> 
wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 05:26:55PM -0700, John Brown wrote:
>> And why would your mother or daughter need more than a single
>> IP address ??
>
> At one point, I had a DSL line with a /28 assignment which I used
> for a dozen or so devices in my house, some of which were used by
> my daugthers.  I fail to understand why I should be required to
> publish any personal data associated with the use of that /28.
> My upstream ISP should proxy that data for me so that I don't get
> unsolicited intrusions in my personal life.
>
> -ron



-- 
If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.