[ppml] Last Call for Comment: Policy Proposal 2003-3

[Owen DeLong]

I still think this policy is a bad idea.  I still think if anyone wants
enough address space to get swipped (a /29 or larger), there's no reason
they can't remain accountable for that address space.  There are already
multiple options for said person to protect their personal privacy:

	P.O. Boxes,
	Company Names (it's really easy to create a schedule C company)
	etc.

This policy just serves to further allow for SPAMMERS to get anonymous
IP blocks.

Owen

	

--On Tuesday, November 18, 2003 14:07 -0500 Member Services 
<memsvcs at arin.net> wrote:

> The ARIN Advisory Council voted to forward the following policy
> proposal to the ARIN Board of Trustees for consideration.
>
> This is a last call for comments on this policy proposal prior
> to the ARIN Board of Trustees review. Comments received during
> this period will be included with the proposal when it is presented
> to the Board of Trustees for their consideration.
>
> Please send your comments to ppml at arin.net. This last call will
> expire at 23:59 EST on December 3, 2003.
>
>
> Member Services
> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
>
>
> *** Last Call: Policy Proposal 2003-3: Residential Customer Privacy ***
>
> An organization with downstream residential customers may substitute
> that organization's name for the customer's name, e.g. 'Private
> customer - XYZ Network', and the customer's street address may read
> 'Private Residence'. Each private downstream residential reassignment
> must have accurate upstream Abuse and Technical POCs visible on the
> WHOIS record for that block.
>
>## END ##



-- 
If this message was not signed with gpg key 0FE2AA3D, it's probably
a forgery.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20031118/7194d992/attachment.sig>