[ppml] Policy Proposal 2003-1a: Required Performance of Abuse Contact

[Ron da Silva]

On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 05:06:07PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
> 
> 2.	Can be defined in terms that would allow most
> routers to block the abuse in question through
> the use of packet filters or other commonly available technology.
>
> (Commonly available technology for this purpose
> means a feature that is present and can be
> reasonably implemented in the majority of
> backbone router types in use on the Internet
> at the time of complaint.)


Hmm...other devices or appliances besides 'routers' may facilitate
this type of functionality.

> ...After the 30 days
> has expired or the ORG has terminated the 30 day period as described,
> the ABUSE COUNCIL shall have 10 days to make a final determination on
> the revocation...

This would require the ABUCE COUNCIL to possibly convene every 10 days.
If the number of appeals are low, this might be ok though and a non-issue.

-ron