[ppml] Waiver of IPv6 Fees

David Conrad david.conrad at nominum.com
Tue Jan 7 01:57:32 EST 2003

I would be very interested in hearing the details as to why they could 
not get space.


On Monday, January 6, 2003, at 06:02  PM, John M. Brown wrote:

> There are multiple ISP's in NM that would like to
> start building v6 networks.  Some are ARIN clients, most
> are not.
> They can't get the space.  We have stalled the system.
> Cool apps won't be built without people playing around and
> building.  Like Bill says, this isn't how things are done.
> john brown
> former AC member
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-ppml at arin.net [mailto:owner-ppml at arin.net] On
>> Behalf Of Bill Woodcock
>> Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 4:50 PM
>> To: william at elan.net
>> Cc: ppml at arin.net
>> Subject: Re: [ppml] Waiver of IPv6 Fees
>>> Just to be clear - I'm basicly for what Bill Woodcock
>> is proposing, I just
>>> think it should have been done slightly differently.
>> But if nothing else,
>>> doing ip allocations by ARIN to individuals for small
>> or no charge to
>>> encorage deployment will work too. I just want it to be
>> clear from the
>>> start that such allocations would be temporary and not
>> like swamp space...
>> I'm not for temporary.  I think that's exactly the problem we
>> have now. Nobody's willing to invest themselves in getting it
>> going, because they know that success means that they have to
>> start paying someone else for the privelege of using what
>> they just built.  That's not the way things get done on the Internet.
>>                                 -Bill

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list