[ppml] Waiver of IPv6 Fees
John M. Brown
john at chagres.net
Mon Jan 6 21:03:16 EST 2003
Joe if you understood v6, then you would understand that your statement
below is less valid with v6 than with v4.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ppml at arin.net [mailto:owner-ppml at arin.net] On
> Behalf Of Joe Baptista
> Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 6:04 PM
> To: Bill Woodcock
> Cc: william at elan.net; ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [ppml] Waiver of IPv6 Fees
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> > I'm not for temporary. I think that's exactly the problem we have
> > now. Nobody's willing to invest themselves in getting it going,
> > because they know that success means that they have to start paying
> > someone else for the privelege of using what they just
> built. That's
> > not the way things get done on the Internet.
> Agreed - anyone who has had to renumber understands the
> horror of temporary.
More information about the ARIN-PPML