[ppml] Policy Revision Proposal
Mury
mury at goldengate.net
Thu Jan 9 21:12:02 EST 2003
I understand your point with d), but I think it's important to honor the
goal of keeping routing tables clean, and therefore respectfully disagree.
I don't understand your objections to c). Why do you need to hand out IP
space to others from a /48? If you are handing out IP space the mirco
allocation provisions wouldn't even apply to you. You would be getting a
/32.
Mury
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Phil Howard wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 04:42:14PM -0600, Mury wrote:
>
> | c) Those receiving micro allocations shall not be allowed to
> | make further allocations or assignments out of their /48. It
> | is intended for their internal use only.
> |
> | d) When possible those receiving micro allocations shall
> | return their allocation and receive a new /48 from their
> | upstream provider (a LIR). This is requested in a good faith
> | manner until Jan 1, 2007 at which time all micro allocations
> | granted under these waived criteria must be returned.
>
> These two things, either alone, will keep me from being an early
> adopter. Maybe that will be one less early adopter than you had
> hoped for. Or maybe a lot of others won't become early adopters
> as a result, either.
>
> I already just made up some IPv6 addresses and started using them
> for internal use. I don't need an allocation from ARIN to do that.
> To me, early adoption is for the purpose of easing into real IPv6
> deployment. I certainly don't want a renumbering looking ahead.
> If that's the case, then I'll wait for my upstream. And when they
> ask me if I'd like to do IPv6 right now ... well ... they won't ask
> so I don't even need to tell you the answer.
>
> If anything, the early adopters should be required to actually be
> online and active with their address space as soon as the paths are
> open to do so. And as a reward for meeting that requirement, they
> get to keep the address space for as long as they remain actively
> connected. That is opposite of (c) and (d) above.
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> | Phil Howard - KA9WGN | Dallas | http://linuxhomepage.com/ |
> | phil-nospam at ipal.net | Texas, USA | http://ka9wgn.ham.org/ |
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list