[ppml] Revocation

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Tue Feb 18 20:40:29 EST 2003

Count this as my vote to keep it the way it is.  I find lists that set
the Reply-To to the list annoying.


--On Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:49 PM -0500 Brian Bergin 
<arin_ppml at comcept.net> wrote:

> At 19:16 18 02 03 Tuesday, you wrote:
>> Brian - Please send this to ppml at arin.net.  In order to have a productive
>> policy discussion, we need this type of dialogue there.  Consider
>> addressing which contact info is required, optional, how to interface
>> with providers who are not directly members of ARIN, etc.  We should be
>> able to come up with something that is not friendly to SPAMMERS but also
>> is
>> acceptable to the ARIN membership and the internet community in general.
>> thanks!
>> -ron
> I just noticed this, even after I posted earlier about having private
> discussions.  ARIN's lists allow, actually encourage, replies to the
> sender not the list.  That's a poor setup IMHO.  One must remember to
> change the To: to the ARIN address.  It's too easy to jot down a reply
> and hit send without remembering to change the To: address.
> I would propose a policy change to ARIN that their lists have replies go
> to the list and not the sender.  It's normally a simple change to most
> list servers, it is on ours.
> Again, my apologies...
> Brian

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list