[ppml] List modification

[McBurnett, Jim]

In support of Owen:
1. I Agree
2. Due to the massive amounts of email I get,
	I use rules to redirect it to a special ARIN
	folder. When someone does a Reply All, the email
	hits instant notice.
3. If it was set up this way, and has been for so long, why change it now?

Jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen at delong.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:40 PM
> To: Brian Bergin; ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [ppml] Revocation
> 
> 
> Count this as my vote to keep it the way it is.  I find lists that set
> the Reply-To to the list annoying.
> 
> Owen
> 
> 
> --On Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:49 PM -0500 Brian Bergin 
> <arin_ppml at comcept.net> wrote:
> 
> > At 19:16 18 02 03 Tuesday, you wrote:
> >> Brian - Please send this to ppml at arin.net.  In order to 
> have a productive
> >> policy discussion, we need this type of dialogue there.  Consider
> >> addressing which contact info is required, optional, how 
> to interface
> >> with providers who are not directly members of ARIN, etc.  
> We should be
> >> able to come up with something that is not friendly to 
> SPAMMERS but also
> >> is
> >> acceptable to the ARIN membership and the internet 
> community in general.
> >>
> >> thanks!
> >> -ron
> >
> > I just noticed this, even after I posted earlier about 
> having private
> > discussions.  ARIN's lists allow, actually encourage, replies to the
> > sender not the list.  That's a poor setup IMHO.  One must 
> remember to
> > change the To: to the ARIN address.  It's too easy to jot 
> down a reply
> > and hit send without remembering to change the To: address.
> >
> > I would propose a policy change to ARIN that their lists 
> have replies go
> > to the list and not the sender.  It's normally a simple 
> change to most
> > list servers, it is on ours.
> >
> > Again, my apologies...
> >
> > Brian
> 
> 
>