[ppml] Revocation
Owen DeLong
owen at delong.com
Tue Feb 18 20:40:29 EST 2003
Count this as my vote to keep it the way it is. I find lists that set
the Reply-To to the list annoying.
Owen
--On Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:49 PM -0500 Brian Bergin
<arin_ppml at comcept.net> wrote:
> At 19:16 18 02 03 Tuesday, you wrote:
>> Brian - Please send this to ppml at arin.net. In order to have a productive
>> policy discussion, we need this type of dialogue there. Consider
>> addressing which contact info is required, optional, how to interface
>> with providers who are not directly members of ARIN, etc. We should be
>> able to come up with something that is not friendly to SPAMMERS but also
>> is
>> acceptable to the ARIN membership and the internet community in general.
>>
>> thanks!
>> -ron
>
> I just noticed this, even after I posted earlier about having private
> discussions. ARIN's lists allow, actually encourage, replies to the
> sender not the list. That's a poor setup IMHO. One must remember to
> change the To: to the ARIN address. It's too easy to jot down a reply
> and hit send without remembering to change the To: address.
>
> I would propose a policy change to ARIN that their lists have replies go
> to the list and not the sender. It's normally a simple change to most
> list servers, it is on ours.
>
> Again, my apologies...
>
> Brian
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list