[ppml] Policy Proposal 2002-3: Micro-Assignments forMultihome d Networks

Leo Bicknell bicknell at ufp.org
Fri Aug 22 15:51:13 EDT 2003


In a message written on Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 02:45:07PM -0500, Bill Darte wrote:
> So, you would argue that we should look for negative impact throughout a two
> year period
> in order to ensure that the policy was viable before migrating the boundary
> to /23?  Could we
> improve the time to 'understanding and adoption' by some vehicle you could
> propose?

No, I would argue we should go right to /24 now, let the industry deal
with whatever problems come up, and in two years look at how we did.

-- 
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request at tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20030822/12425028/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list