[ppml] Policy Proposal 2002-3: Micro-Assignments forMultihome d Networks

[Bill Darte]

> In a message written on Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 02:45:07PM 
> -0500, Bill Darte wrote:
> > So, you would argue that we should look for negative impact 
> throughout a two
> > year period
> > in order to ensure that the policy was viable before 
> migrating the boundary
> > to /23?  Could we
> > improve the time to 'understanding and adoption' by some 
> vehicle you could
> > propose?
> 
> No, I would argue we should go right to /24 now, let the industry deal
> with whatever problems come up, and in two years look at how we did.

Sorry, can't support that.... we would do the 'invisible constituency' a
disservice to assign addresses
that are unusable.

Bill Darte
ARIN Advisory Council 

> 
> -- 
>        Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
>         PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
> Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request at tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
>