[ppml] Re: Dealing with ARIN.. my experiences & tips
david.conrad at nominum.com
Mon Apr 14 20:07:42 EDT 2003
NANOG was the wrong place for this, ppml at arin.net cc'd instead.
On Monday, April 14, 2003, at 03:47 PM, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> Thus spake "Alec H. Peterson" <ahp at hilander.com>
>> --On Monday, April 14, 2003 16:20 -0500 Stephen Sprunk
> <stephen at sprunk.org>
>>> RIRs should allow a member to voluntarily renumber several disparate
>>> allocations into a single prefix. The original allocations would be
>>> forfeit after a reasonable renumbering period, e.g. 6 months. If the
>>> member has at least one PI allocation, they should be allowed to
>>> it with PA allocations into a new, larger PI allocation.
>> This proposal will be coming out for final call on ppml at arin.net
>> slightly modified to address concerns raised on the mailing list and
>> public policy meeting last week in Memphis.
> Not bad, but there's two specific things I'd add:
> 1. Entities should be able to trade in PA blocks as well, provided
> they are
> trading in at least one PI block.
I don't understand this. If it is PA, then it isn't using a "routing
slot", so what advantage is gained by including it?
> 2. The policy should explicitly state that no justification is
> beyond that necessary to establish tenancy in the returned blocks.
> I'll wander over to ppml at arin.net, as it's apparently become more
> than it was in the past.
One would hope...
More information about the ARIN-PPML