[ppml] Re: ARIN Policy Proposal 2002-7

[moraleja]

----- Original Message -----
From: Jim Fleming <JimFleming at ameritech.net>
To: <apisan at servidor.unam.mx>; <karl at cavebear.com>;
<vinton.g.cerf at wcom.com>; <lyman at acm.org>; <lynn at icann.org>; Member Services
<memsvcs at arin.net>; <arin-announce at arin.net>; <ppml at arin.net>
Cc: <DannyYounger at cs.com>; <chandley at ntia.doc.gov>; <censslin at ntia.doc.gov>;
<DEvans at doc.gov>; <nvictory at ntia.doc.gov>; <RLayton at ntia.doc.gov>; Ron
Sherwood <sherwood at islands.vi>; Richard J. Sexton <richard at vrx.net>; Richard
Henderson <richardhenderson at ntlworld.com>; <ray at fassett.org>;
<k at widgital.com>; Joe Baptista <baptista at dot-god.com>; <jefsey at jefsey.com>;
<james.love at cptech.org>; <espresso at e-scape.net>; <eric at hi-tek.com>;
<ellen at rony.com>; Bruce Young <Bruce at barelyadequate.info>; Joop Teernstra
<terastra at terabytz.co.nz>; @quasar Internet Solutions, Inc.
<shore at quasar.net>; <jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 4:01 PM
Subject: [ppml] Re: ARIN Policy Proposal 2002-7


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Member Services" <memsvcs at arin.net>
> >
> > The following new fee schedule for /21 - /24 should be implemented as
> > follows (based on the current fee schedule with a smaller minimum):
> > $400.00 per year for /23 - /24
> > $1000.00 per year for /21 - /22
> >
>
> 1. Companies regularly charge consumers $10 to $15 per month for ONE IPv4
static address.
>
> 2. It is common in the real estate business in meat space for a broker to
take one month's rent as a fee.
>
> 3. A /24 allows over 250 nodes (hosts, PCs, etc.) to be addressed.
>
> 4. At $12.50 per month that is $3,125 per month in revenue from address
leasing.
>
> 5. Applying #2 and #4, one would assume the annual lease fee would be
about $3,000, not $400.
>
> Does ICANN get the balance of the $3,000 - $400 = $2,600 per year per /24
?....or the U.S. Government...?
>
> Also...what is LACNIC paying the U.S. Government for address space ?
> http://lacnic.net/en/transition.html
>
>
>
> Jim Fleming
> 2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB:...IPv8 is closer than you think...IPv16 is even
closer...
> http://www.netfilter.org/
> http://www.analogx.com/contents/dnsdig.htm
> http://ipv8.dyndns.tv
> http://ipv8.yi.org
> http://ipv8.dyns.cx
> http://ipv8.no-ip.com
> http://ipv8.no-ip.org
> http://ipv8.no-ip.biz
> http://ipv8.no-ip.info
> http://ipv8.myip.us
> http://ipv8.dyn.ee
> http://ipv8.community.net.au
> http://ipv8.ods.org
>