[ppml] ARIN Policy Proposal 2002-9 (fwd)

[sigma at smx.pair.com]

The argument I've always heard is "Company A is using 192.168.1.0 and so is
Company B".  But one or the other company would have to renumber,
regardless, so it hardly seems to matter if Company B renumbers to
192.168.2.0 (or 10.10.10.10 for that matter), or if they renumber to some
non-routed block of "public" IP space.

I have to weigh in and agree that the "quick fix" idea of handing out /24's
is short-sighted and disregards what has happened in the past.

Kevin

----- Forwarded message from Mury -----