[ppml] Policy Proposal 2002-6 reworded?
Stacy_Taylor at icgcomm.com
Fri Nov 15 15:13:24 EST 2002
I like Alex's sentence, and this wording of the policy.
From: Alex Kamantauskas [mailto:alexk at tugger.net]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 8:44 AM
To: Bill Darte
Cc: 'ppml at arin.net'
Subject: Re: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2002-6 reworded?
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Bill Darte wrote:
> Suppose 2002-6 were reworded to reflect the issues raised as such.....
> Proposed rewording....
> If any organization relinquishes a group of portable, non-aggregatable
> address blocks to ARIN, they shall receive a block in exchange. Exchange
> blocks will be of sufficient size to contain the space of all returned
> blocks without justification up to /17. Exchange blocks of greater than
> will require justification of address useage per existing ARIN
> for addtional address allocations. Exchange blocks larger than /20 must
> renumbered within 12 months; all others must be renumbered within 6
> If ALL returned blocks were maintained by ARIN without maintenance fees,
> exchange block will also be maintained without fee.
> Other alternatives?
I would modify this to read:
"Exchange blocks larger than /20 must be renumbered within 12 months; all
others must be renumbered within 6 months unless organization can justify
a timeframe extension"
More information about the ARIN-PPML