[ppml] Policy Proposal 2002-1

[Bill Darte]

Got it.... just making sure!
Thanks...
billd

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Taylor, Stacy [mailto:Stacy_Taylor at icgcomm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 12:48 PM
> To: 'Bill Darte'; 'ppml at arin.net'
> Subject: RE: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2002-1
> 
> 
> Items 1, 2, and 3 elicit fairly immediate responses, yes?  The postal
> solution would occur should the other three fail, and it 
> would be the last
> step before consequences.  The letter would serve as Notice 
> of Action by the
> Registry.
> 
> Stacy
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Darte [mailto:billd at cait.wustl.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 10:24 AM
> To: 'Taylor, Stacy'; 'ppml at arin.net'
> Subject: RE: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2002-1
> 
> 
> Is the "Request response withing 30days" associated only with 
> item 4 or all
> of them???
> 
> billd
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Taylor, Stacy [mailto:Stacy_Taylor at icgcomm.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 10:33 AM
> > To: 'ppml at arin.net'
> > Subject: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2002-1
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Everyone,
> > The language of the process of notifying lame in-addr.arpas 
> > is convoluted.
> > Can we simplify it in this way?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 1) E-mail the POC associated with the in-addr.arpa
> > delegation from the ARIN database.
> > 2) E-mail the POC associated with the ASN(s) originating
> > the route in the global routing table.
> > 3) Telephone any POC associated with the ASN or ARIN records.
> > 4) Send postal mail any POC associated with the ASN or ARIN 
> > records. Request
> > response within 30 days.
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Stacy
> > 
> > 
>