[ppml] Policy Proposal 2002-6 reworded?

[Taylor, Stacy]

Excellent point.  The original wording stands, then?


-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Darte [mailto:billd at cait.wustl.edu]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 12:43 PM
To: 'Taylor, Stacy '; ''Alex Kamantauskas' '; Bill Darte
Cc: ''ppml at arin.net' '
Subject: RE: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2002-6 reworded?


The ARIN BoT has asked the AC to provide crisp and unambiguous policy
statements.....

While, as I have said, I have sympathy for those with 'extraordinary'
circumstances which might cause them to have trouble meeting the
requirements for renumbering and would thus cause them to petition for more
time from ARIN.

This places and extraordinary burden on ARIN staff as well....

If we MUST put this extension justification language in then I suggest we
MUST provide some representative guidance on what would qualify for
justification.......much as the examples of Internet Infrastructure
associated with the micro allocations policy.....

I urge that we do not incorporate such language, but leave to the
organization the understanding that they need to make extraordinary
preparation for renumbering if they have extraordinary renumbering
circumstances.... and wish to take advantage of this policy.

billd




-----Original Message-----
From: Taylor, Stacy
To: 'Alex Kamantauskas'; Bill Darte
Cc: 'ppml at arin.net'
Sent: 11/15/02 2:13 PM
Subject: RE: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2002-6 reworded?

I like Alex's sentence, and this wording of the policy.
Thanks,
Stacy

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Kamantauskas [mailto:alexk at tugger.net]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 8:44 AM
To: Bill Darte
Cc: 'ppml at arin.net'
Subject: Re: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2002-6 reworded?


On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Bill Darte wrote:

> Suppose 2002-6 were reworded to reflect the issues raised as such.....
>
>
> Proposed rewording....
>
> If any organization relinquishes a group of portable, non-aggregatable
> address blocks to ARIN, they shall receive a block in exchange.
Exchange
> blocks will be of sufficient size to contain the space of all returned
> blocks without justification up to /17.  Exchange blocks of greater
than
/17
> will require justification of address useage per existing ARIN
requirements
> for addtional address allocations.  Exchange blocks larger than /20
must
be
> renumbered within 12 months; all others must be renumbered within 6
months.
> If ALL returned blocks were maintained by ARIN without maintenance
fees,
the
> exchange block will also be maintained without fee.
>
>
> Other alternatives?
>

 I would modify this to read:

 "Exchange blocks larger than /20 must be renumbered within 12 months;
all
 others must be renumbered within 6 months unless organization can
justify
 a timeframe extension"

-- 
/ak