[ppml] Policy Proposal 2002-6 reworded?

[Taylor, Stacy]

I like Alex's sentence, and this wording of the policy.
Thanks,
Stacy

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Kamantauskas [mailto:alexk at tugger.net]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 8:44 AM
To: Bill Darte
Cc: 'ppml at arin.net'
Subject: Re: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2002-6 reworded?


On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Bill Darte wrote:

> Suppose 2002-6 were reworded to reflect the issues raised as such.....
>
>
> Proposed rewording....
>
> If any organization relinquishes a group of portable, non-aggregatable
> address blocks to ARIN, they shall receive a block in exchange.  Exchange
> blocks will be of sufficient size to contain the space of all returned
> blocks without justification up to /17.  Exchange blocks of greater than
/17
> will require justification of address useage per existing ARIN
requirements
> for addtional address allocations.  Exchange blocks larger than /20 must
be
> renumbered within 12 months; all others must be renumbered within 6
months.
> If ALL returned blocks were maintained by ARIN without maintenance fees,
the
> exchange block will also be maintained without fee.
>
>
> Other alternatives?
>

 I would modify this to read:

 "Exchange blocks larger than /20 must be renumbered within 12 months; all
 others must be renumbered within 6 months unless organization can justify
 a timeframe extension"

-- 
/ak