Policy Proposal 2002-1
randy at psg.com
Fri Mar 8 12:42:44 EST 2002
> Policy Proposal 2002-1: Lame Delegations in IN-ADDR.ARPA
> It is proposed that ARIN actively identify lame servers on a regular
> basis and notify the ARIN point of contact (POC) of their findings. It
> is further proposed that ARIN monitor the status of those identified
> lame servers and remove all delegations that remain lame for a period of
> 30 days.
yes!!! at last, something to move towards cleaning up bad data and keeping
it clean. thank you!
> * How should the term "lame" be defined, as it relates to this proposed
any of the delegatee servers does not return soa and exactly matching ns
rrset to queries
> o Should lame delegations be identified in WHOIS, or simply removed?
removed. whois cruisin' humans are not hurt by lamers, systems using
> o If they are removed, should ARIN publicly document removals?
it would be nice if the whois noted it, so that folk debugging could
> * How should the POCs of networks with lame servers be contacted by
> * Should ARIN proactively or reactively conduct monitoring to identify
> lame delegations?
More information about the ARIN-PPML