[ppml] Wording issues with the 2002-6 Aggregation Requests Proposal???

Craig A. Huegen chuegen at cisco.com
Tue Dec 3 16:56:08 EST 2002

On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Bill Darte wrote:

> Proposed.....
> If any organization relinquishes a group of portable, non-aggregatable

I'm fine with Bill's wording on this but would ask for another statement
to be added.  The new blocks should be aligned with the published "minimum
allocation" size.

For instance, if I were to return 3 /24's in exchange for a /22 from 205/8
space, I would expect that /22 to come out of space that had an allocation
policy of /22 or longer.  Otherwise, the organization is subject to some
filters presently in place on minimum prefix length based on registry


Craig A. Huegen, Chief Network Architect      C i s c o  S y s t e m s
IT Transport, Network Technology & Design           ||        ||
Cisco Systems, Inc., 400 East Tasman Drive          ||        ||
San Jose, CA  95134, (408) 526-8104                ||||      ||||
email: chuegen at cisco.com       CCIE #2100      ..:||||||:..:||||||:..

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list